Twenty council members were asked which email tactic had worked better than they expected, and the answers divide almost evenly into two camps: better timing and better targeting on one side, better writing on the other. Behaviour-triggered sends against scheduled ones. Sending at each subscriber’s own best hour rather than one broadcast time. Front-loading the value into the first twenty words so an AI summariser carries it. Fitting the whole thing on one phone screen. Azlan’s answer sits underneath all of them: stop thinking in campaigns and start thinking in experiences, decided by what the individual has actually done — which is a different argument from any single tactic, because it is what makes the tactics repeatable rather than lucky.
“Stop thinking in campaigns and start thinking in experiences: better targeting, better timing and better format, decided by what the individual has actually done, with content modular enough to assemble that way.”
One of 20 council members contributing.
READ ON FORBES →